Forum
Community Forum
Today's Posts
FAQ & Rules
Members List

Writing
Writing Forum
Recent Posts
Critique Guidelines

Groups
YWO Social Groups
Facebook
Myspace

Chat
 
YWA

Register

Store
Support YWO
YWO Merchandise
The Book Despository
Amazon.com (US)
Amazon.co.uk (UK)
Amazon.ca (Canada)

SBS Mag


View Poll Results: Is the book better, or is it usually the movie based on the book?
Book's usually better 39 78.00%
It's half and half 10 20.00%
Movie's usually better 0 0%
I can't decide! 1 2.00%
Voters: 50. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-14-2008, 04:43 AM View Post #21 (Link)
GeorgeMichael (Offline)
Freelance Writer
 
GeorgeMichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: No longer in a boring city!
Posts: 910
Points: 7.3
Times Thanked: 54
Now that we're on the subject I would also like to say that while I don't see it as the best of the year it is also definitely on my top three on Will Smith's movies. It's true his acting is incredible in this movie and it's a true testament to America's love of Will Smith. It broke box office records for December. It was a movie that for all people knew really had only one actor...and a dog. (I won't spoil anything) He had no one to work with pretty much and he carried the movie, I can't really think of many actors that can literally carry a movie on their own.
__________________
Reading List for January


Salem's Lot - Stephen King
A Game of Thrones - GRRM
The Lost Symbol - Dan Brown

If anyone is wondering, my boyfriend's internet is the absolute worst piece of shit in existence, and it causes my computer to slow down significantly anytime I enter the Chatroom. It also causes the chatroom to freeze anyway, so it's a bit futile to attempt to log in while I'm at his place.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 06:56 AM View Post #22 (Link)
Clawfire (Offline)
Literary Newbie
 
Clawfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: In this twisted paradise we call the earth
Posts: 4
Points: 30
Times Thanked: 13
Books rock so much more than Movies…!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
People assume that time
is a strict progression of cause to effect,
but actually, from a nonlinear,
non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like
a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey...

stuff.
- The Doctor (David Tennant)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 07:03 AM View Post #23 (Link)
Anira (Offline)
Scholarly Apprentice
 
Anira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 119
Points: 30
Times Thanked: 5
I am a book purist! I can't see a movie based on a book without completely disassociating the two.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2010, 08:07 AM View Post #24 (Link)
FayGee (Offline)
Aspiring Author
 
FayGee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: the home is where the heart is!
Posts: 528
Points: 22.57
Times Thanked: 30
Book is not usually better, it always is!
__________________
YWO Awards 2011:
Most Welcoming Member: FayGee
Worst Spammer: FayGee

Roses are red
Violets are blue
Some poems rhyme
This one doesn't


So ha.

I collect thank points.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 07:15 PM View Post #25 (Link)
lalodragon (Offline)
Global Moderator
 
lalodragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: To the laboratory!
Posts: 1,982
Points: 30
Times Thanked: 193
Books! I don't think there was a lot of debate here.
2001 was the only one where the movie was actually better, and that was only because the book was written for the movie and the sequel (2010) lined up with the movie (going to Jupiter) not the book (going to Saturn).
I didn't even know there was a Jurassic Park book....
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 10:50 AM View Post #26 (Link)
Writer2105 (Offline)
Literary Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: England
Posts: 8
Points: 5
Times Thanked: 0
Depends on the writer and film director, as we submit it, so it depends on circumstances
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 08:25 PM View Post #27 (Link)
bookworm (Offline)
Creative Fanatic
 
bookworm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: void
Posts: 957
Points: 30
Times Thanked: 151
Books are usually better because there's time for detail. The film only includes the most important things that happened. Sometimes, though, the books are so bad that it's better without the details.
__________________
Originally Posted by Samuel Beckett, Worstward Ho
The void. Before the staring eyes. Stare where they may. Far and wide. High and low. That narrow field. Know no more. See no more. Say no more. That alone. That little much of void alone.
arcadia
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2011, 08:52 PM View Post #28 (Link)
wutheringheights (Offline)
Idea Scribe
 
wutheringheights's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: a secret government base on the dark side of the moon
Posts: 50
Points: 5.58
Times Thanked: 0
I think it's half and half because the book is amazing and has so many more details, but I always love actually seeing the characters and watching the plot I'd read about (plus, I like whispering to my sister what's going to happen)
__________________
"If all else perished, and he remained, I should still continue to be; and if all else remained, and he were annihilated, the universe would turn to a mighty stranger: I should not seem a part of it."
- Emily Bronte, Wuthering Heights, Ch. 9
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2016, 11:14 AM View Post #29 (Link) Re
KathyHamilton (Offline)
Novice Writer
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 10
Points: 5
Times Thanked: 0
I would like to choose book better than movies. I watch movies which have been made from the stories in a book.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:45 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 - Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All writing Copyright © its author(s). All other material Copyright © 2007-2012 Young Writers Online unless otherwise specified.
Managed by Andrew Kukwa (Andy) and Shaun Duke (Shaun) from The World in the Satin Bag. Design by HTWoRKS.