PDA

View Full Version : Three Possibilities of Metaphysical Outcomes to the Universe


Phyx
02-15-2009, 09:26 PM
(Please take into account that the Big Bounce is of vital importance in this argument)

The Universe, supposedly, an eternal state of matter that will last throughout time, but, as it continues to expand, it is uncertain of what will become of such matter. Metaphysics philosophers have summed up three possible outcomes, as well as several theories that do not lead to any of these outcomes, but can factorise into different states of star birth, gamma explosions, meteorite collisions etcetera.

Continuous Theorem

The most basic is the expansion from the prospect of the big bang, and will so forth always expand and never alter. But, this is flawed. As things expand beyond great matter, then the temperature begins to cool down, and as only three degrees centigrade above Absolute Zero, expansion ceases. And, due to a huge amount of gravity formed from the birth and death of stars, combining into black holes, quasars, and then contraction can occur.

Cease Theorem

After many millennia of expansion, the temperature will cool down to Absolute Zero and remain a being that will neither contract, nor expand. But, for the same reason as the first, gravity could eventually pull the seams into an eternal state of void. But, as gamma explosions happen, they have the effect of spreading particles. So it’s possible that it would push beyond the boundaries of naturalistic temperature functions, so Absolute Zero is regarded as only a temporary time.

Contraction Theorem

It is logical that from the death of stars that black holes begin to overlap each other and eliminate the only definite form which is gravity. But, this would mean that everything is sucked back into one sub atomic particle of infinite weight and gravity. So, it would then expand again due to the atomic particle bursting to form another Big Bang, creating the Big Bounce. Stephen Hawking recently prophesized that black holes construct as much as they destruct, which is also a logical theory. But, if such contraction occurs, it will cool down, and cease to contract or expand, due to Absolute Zero rendering it obsolete.

So…discuss…

MasterCarlton
02-16-2009, 11:16 AM
well, I don't know an awful lot about this but I must say I have to go with Continuous Theorem, it just seems the most logical. I mean Cease Theorem just seems unlikely to me. But Contraction Theorem also seems likely.

But I beleive the universe will always expand, not so much contract. However I dont agree that the universe will never alter as if it's expanding then ofcourse temperature will change and thus stars will change and eventually gravity.

Shaun
02-23-2009, 11:30 PM
To be honest, I don't think any one theory has the right answer for us at this point. Most of the science being done in this department is educated guesswork, which, while better than saying "Jesus did it," isn't as strong as actually having a working, verifiable theory.

I'm not sure we'll ever know all the answers in this department, though. I suspect that all three have some basis in truth, though. The only way to really know is to stick around long enough to see what happens :P.